Looks Can Be Deceiving
Phoenix Theatre's
Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf?
(out of )
Mark S.P. Turvin
(home office) (602) 912-0117
I can be reached for comment via e-mail at:
mspt@goldfishpublishers.com

Reviewed 4/9/99

Let's just say it and be done with it; the production of Edward Albee's Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf? that Director Gary Griffin offers looks all wrong. Textually, Mr. Albee has called his braying, strong-willed Martha an "earth mother," and Phoenix Theatre's production utilizes Wendy Robie, whose slight and tight body are nothing resembling the stereotypical definition of that phrase. He makes History professor George out to be a milquetoast, and valley favorite Kim Bennett towers over the rest of the cast in an interesting mixture of John Cleese and former PT Artistic Director Michael Mitchell. He defines young Biology professor Nick as a '60s All-American stud muffin, yet Matthew Mazuroski just isn't the quarterback type. Finally, the term used to describe Nick's ninny-noddle of a wife, Honey, is "thin-hipped," yet the costume that Susan Johnson-Hood has created for actress Maggie Hunts does not hide the inaccuracy of that description. And yet, despite how wrong the production actually looks, no one can deny that Mr. Griffin's snappy direction, as well as the cast's impeccable acting and timing proves the old adage that looks can be deceiving. Once the odd look of the choices is gotten past, the power of the production takes over.


Mr. Albee's wonderful text is here unmolested. The audience is treated, as few audiences are, to every single letter of his original script, and the nearly overwhelmed crowd that stumbles out of the theatre at 11 p.m. can understand why this play is one of the seminal scripts of modern American drama. The fury and volatility of the dialogue, and the bitterness of the topic, are well served by actors and director. The rapid-fire delivery of the textual body-blows, and especially Mr. Bennett's off-handed lobbing of word-grenades, keep this production from ever sinking into tediousness. There are definitely moments that drag, and some of Mr. Albee's repetitions can be wearing on an audience, but Mr. Griffin's nearly choreographed pacing never allows the audience a chance to lose their interest completely. By the end of the evening, everyone on both sides of the footlights is worn out, but in a good way.


The best performance of the evening comes from Mr. Bennett, who is fiendishly acquiescent, while always looking for ways to seize control of the situation. The flip way that he tosses off his cruel epithets is pure genius. While he really does seem too powerful to be Martha's browbeaten, downtrodden mate, this acquiescence is his best justification, and he uses it to perfect effect.


Unfortunately, it's not just looks that hamper Ms. Robie. Her performance is the only one that seems a bit out of synch with the rest of the show. She has some weird cadences and pauses in her delivery that call attention to themselves. This is a Martha who brays, but in a strangled way that seems slightly odd in comparison to the normal interpretation of her character. Having to overcome her slight build and stature has turned Ms. Robie more into a pitbull than a grizzly bear, and while still just as menacing, it leaves her less choices when spewing her bile.
Despite his more basketball center appearance, Mr. Mazuroski has the attitude of the self-centered Nick down pat. Whether pathetically flirting with Martha, or attempting to one-up the sneaky George, Mr. Mazuroski plunges ahead, never aware of the obviousness of his characters machinations.


Finally, as the silly simp, Honey, Ms. Hunts is annoying without being an annoyance in the overall production. Hers is not a mouse in the Sandy Dennis vein, but a loud, tittering dunce who flaunts, rather than fall into, her lack of connection. This highlights her strongest moment, when she attempts to avoid, but is dragged into, the revealing of George's final, insidious game.


Unfortunately, the cavernous stage of Phoenix Theatre and Gro Johre's use of implied New England stodginess only works with the decrepit furniture onstage. The paintings on the walls, and the low-rise bookshelves do not bring across the cramped, on-a-budget feel of the setting necessary. Paul Black's lighting is acceptable, though the many shadows on the faces of the cast as they move further downstage is an annoyance. His final tableau, though, is a wonderful effect. Ms. Hood's costumes are acceptable on the men, but just plain awful on the women. Mr. Mazuroski's too-tightly-fitting pants, Ms. Hunt's pillowy party dress, and both of Ms. Robie's ugly costumes were a disservice to the show.


While the casting choices may initially look wrong in this production, the ensemble overcomes any trepidation as they begin their fun and games. This is a worthy show, and a struggle for actor and audience member alike, and the power of its text, in conjunction with the strength of its cast and director, make it acceptable to ignore the production's initial visual impressions.

Production Details:
Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf
by Edward Albee
Phoenix Theatre, Phoenix
(602) 254-2151
April 9th - April 25th, 1999

Index of Goldfish Publishers Web Pages:

Goldfish Publishers Home Page
Mark S.P. Turvin's Plays on the Internet
A Voice from the Audience ; Theatre Reviews for the Phoenix Metropolitan Area

You are visitor number to this site since 4/14/99.

-30-