Peter Hill and I discuss through emails the letter I received concerning reviews and publicity for FHCT and CDT.
Mark S.P. Turvin
mspt@goldfishpublishers.com

From: "Peter Hill" <***@***.***>
Subject: Peter Hill's shows
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 10:45:01 -0700
To: Mark S.P. Turvin

Mark;

I can't help but notice that you did not print my reply regarding 'invitations' to my shows. By choosing not to print my reply, you are deliberately promoting the image that you are not welcome at my theaters.

In my opinion, it has become obvious that you have an agenda and bias regarding me and my shows. Where this comes from I have no idea, but I do not appreciate your attempt to make it appear that I have barred you, or in any way kept you from attending any of the theaters with which I am associated.

I will repeat. You have been to and reviewed my productions before and, like the rest of the theater-going public, you are - and always have been - welcome at any of these theaters.

Peter Hill

Please forgive me; I am not aware of having received an email response. I would never dream of being biased or vindictive in any way. The moment I did receive a response from you, I would have posted it without hesitation, positive or negative, as I have for all of the e-mails I have received from you.

If you will forward me the original email, I will gladly post it, with a note explaining that this had been sent at an earlier time and that it seems that I have misplaced it. I don't mean for the theatre community to believe you have barred me. In fact, I was only responding directly to the request by the woman, and had hoped that I would receive a positive response. I'm very sorry that I did not find it earlier. I will check through my e-mail archives to see if it was automatically moved into a folder without my knowledge. No matter what, I encourage you to either resend the email, or allow me to post this response and my response accordingly.

Cheers,
Mark S.P. Turvin
Freelance Writer